Foucault - death of the author :: essays research papers

M. Foucault, "What is an seed?Michel Foucault (1926 1984) disseminatet with many aspects of social philosophy during his career, but it is his philosophy surrounding the theatrical region and dominance of the author in modern literature that this essay aims to deal with. From the 19th century onwards, Foucault notices that finished social and semipolitical frame constitutes, the presence of an author vastly dominates the content and categorisation of any publication of that author. He in addition throws into question the idea of when an author begins an author and what writings that he produces should become known as his work. The example he gives refers to items such(prenominal) as earn of correspondence or even simple lists that although might have been constructed by the same author of a canonical text, are not recognize as works of literature. What makes works of literature stand out is the content. Indeed, if matchless can recognise some basic principles of an authors works that may be used to relate previously anonymously published work, does that not disprove the existence of an original author. Foucault argues that when these common principles are identified (he himself recognises four in this essay) another could simply produce identically styled work according to these, thence rendering the author obsolete. When considering Marx or Freud who both claim in their work that an individual is only a component of the unconsciousness or political agenda, how can an author as an individual even exist? He recognises the author as a fleeting fingers breadth, only known by dint of the singularity of his absence and his link to death (p.1624) and thereby questions further the role of the individual. Firstly, one must consider the rise of the author and how the idea of the figures importance came to be. Foucault considers Greek mythology when debating this claming that once it was the hero in such plays that was granted his immortality and the author remained largely anonymous. In the middle ages, this assumption changed as names of those who were involved in scientific discoveries were used to verify their truthfulness. Foucault states that in arguments, statements were in the order of Hippocrates says or Pliny tell us that.. (p.1629). This changed in the seventeenth and eighteenth century during the boom of scientific discoveries as that which was held true in scientific spheres was simply part of a greater truth. There was no need to verify the author as the facts were self evident through their existence.