Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Leonardo Da Vinci and Pierre Renoir Comparative Essay
The twain renowned cunningists Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) and Pierre Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) ar some(prenominal) levelheaded role models for the progressing wile society but when comparing these two clever men it is evident that their prowessworks both relinquish a different capacity to the viewers and are portrayed using different art techniques and equipment. Leonardo, born(p) to be known as the archetype of a Renaissance man, was an Italian blusherer, inventor, mathematician, writer, and engineer.He was explicitly known for his realistic, geometrically designed and religiously godly characterizations. Renoir, however, was a french man who devoted his life to introduce the thoughtistic style to the art community. As a true worshiper of born(p) beauty and feminine aura, Renoirs key fruiting symbolized the entire liveliness of French culture and European scenes. Leonardos style of delineation was influenced greatly during the formation of the Renaissance perio d that first emerged in Italy during the 14th to the seventeenth century.It was a new era in which European scholars craved for great knowledge of medieval times and Italy was their primary source for it contained the great art and architecture of Rome and held manuscripts that scholars studied to learn the lives of the early Romans and Greek. Thus about stands of Leonardos paintings portray religious beliefs and mythology. Its art go around in finished images compar adapted to reality and the rubrics conservative, brush strokes concealed, leaving no trace of the creative persons emotions or techniques. Impressionism, however, opposed the entire archetype of Renaissance art.Initiated by French artist, Claude Monet during the late 1870s in France and currently followed by more painters one of which leading them is Pierre Auguste Renoir, conflicted the techniques of French art Schools and ignored their Euclidian perspectives and took advantage of the industrial revolution. The industrial revolution brought the popularity of the camera, metallic element pipages were invented and so paint was achieved in a fast yet sporty way, flock had more leisure time and places such as parks, malls, stores, circ ingestions were easily established.Painters like Auguste Renoir had more subject matters and the opportunity to paint and observe the flutter moment of scant(p) outside instead of relying on their memory and paint inside a studio. Most of Leonardos buyers are fuddled church organizations such as the Catholic Church that value realness as they will use them as either for cathedral decorations or another image worthy for worshiping. During the Renaissance period, if a patron is impulsive to buy for an artwork, he or she controls the subject matter, the completion date, the materials used and a set payment.Artists were alike required to show preliminary plans to be approved by the patron before the actual artwork was painted. Renoir, however, had buyers that appreciated his dyed artworks for the purpose of house decorations or family portraits. Artists like Renoir had more liberty in exhibiting and selling their works. Artists like Renoir painted outdoors and so people had the probability to observe how they capture the scenery in front of them thus, making it easier for them to be recognised. Renoir and Leonardo tract different subject matters in their paintings yet they both possess the ability to dazzle the viewer.Leonardos inspiration revolved mostly in trust which he greatly portrays in St magic the Baptist where St John wears pellets and animal skin while holding loosely a reed staff with a cross at one balance and uses his discipline exit to point up a feminine hand to heaven. On the other hand, Renoirs passion relied on his deep latria for feminine sensuality which he greatly conveys in Nude in Lanscape where a raven, shoulder length haired, naked woman sits on a rock covered with a long white sheet that she like wise uses to wipe her left ankle.The womans body is facing sidewise but her whole flavour is seen as she looks downward on the crushing grasses. The scene is in a tiny forest during a otiose Sunday afternoon. Upon thoroughly studying these two artworks it is evident that the two artists use different colour schemes and art techniques in methodicalness to show the theme of their artwork. Leonardo portrays St Johns wavy, curled hair in an anxious reddish brown colour to imply shadows while a alter pinkish brown to show a tint of shininess.Leonardo also provides an empty, darkish background to achieve negative space in order to enhance his use of chiaroscuro on St Johns face and right section. St Johns innocent, auburn eyes are darkened collectible to the heavy amount of lily-livered light coming from the foreground. St Johns pale lips are curled enigmatically giving the viewer the impression of whether he is pure good or evil. Renoir, on the other hand, uses a dark brown col our with short strokes of a midnight blue colour instead of black to darken it.Renoir provides a vibrant background by using a cool orange to show shadows from the overlapping grasses and impregnable yellow to show the effects of light on the tree drawers and the withering grasses. The neutralized green on the trees foliage recede. The womans body is yellowish due to the amount of yellow light but her face is darkened. The highlights on her body are white. He uses cool purple to show shadows on the white sheet and the superficiality of the lake while a warm red on her body in particular on her chubby breasts, slender back and rosy cheeks to create a sense of form.It also makes the cool colours direct contrast with warm colours. The artists however both use signed lines to implicate suit but have used them in different areas of their paintings. Leonardo uses sign(prenominal) lines to show the liveliness of St Johns hair and contour lines to impeccably form St Johns realistic face, muscular right arm and while using the technique sfumato (which means applying translucent layers of colours) Leonardo was able to achieve a feeling of a three dimensional regularise to the viewer finished with a smooth surface.In contrast to Renoir who uses short, thick, gestural lines to show the continuous movement of his brush strokes in the entire painting providing a simulated texture. He applies wet paint to wet paint without waiting for the successive applications to dry, producing softer edges and intermingling of complementary colours Leonardo and Renoir share touch on importance for how balanced light and dark are in their paintings. The terrible dark background and the vibrancy of ellow light on St Johns face and arm provides a symmetrical balance and value contrast that can easily make St Johns face the emphasis and focal area. Conversely, Renoir uses the trees surrounded by deep shadows to poise the womans plump body in an asymmetrical balance of visual eleme nts. Her face like St John also is the focal area in which the strongest light and dark value contrasts. St John the Baptist and Nude in grace are both oil paintings. But St John the Baptist was painted on walnut wood using tempera paints while Nude in Landscape was painted on canvas using the average metal tube paints.St Johns pointing gesture towards the heavens shows the complete message of the painting that baptism which St John symbolizes is important in order for a human macrocosm to gain salvation. In Nude in Landscape, Renoir has the sole intention of conveyance to the viewer his great love for word picture nude women and how he sees the momentary changes of light on their tender flesh. Leonardos passion for portraying religious characters or biblical matters showed the world the great importance of religion and how it should never be forgotten.He portrays his figures in a realistic room to show viewers his great understanding of the human anatomy and how acquirement and its necessity for thorough observation are related to art. Renoir, however, paints not to share a message to the world but rather show people the majestic effects of light in everything and to remind people that art is not a competition for talent, observation and fame but rather a deep visual expression for ones perspectives and feelings in life.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment