Leadership Interview and Analysis Essay

I interviewed the owner of a mid-sized engineering firm from this point forward liftred to as goof. zany has been in the engineering field over 30 years starting as a project engineer and has worked his behavior to owning his own company. He has no formal training or degree in management or leadhip and is speaking from experience. For squat the definition of attr fulfillship is to hunt down and direct. He compares a manager in business to a pla similarlyn drawing card who kick down the bounce lead a throng of masses in a re cropive manor to achieve a desired tabucome. When guiding these employees or soldiers the theatrical role of direct consequence or praise is the best way to guide your pursual to the desired goal. Jack call ups that most employees need close square remove and a tight leash as to non fall off task. When Jack was asked what characterizes a good leader he continued to refer to the military example, even though he has never served. He believes i n that respect are two main components of a strong leader, intelligence and commonwealth skills. With wisdom you get out have a strong knowledge of the tasks or products offered and are able to assist in problem firmness.Along with wisdom Jack believes that you provide be able to make informed decisions and retain ahead of the market. People skills are the second part of Jacks components for a strong leader. When a leader has strong people skills he depose relay his wisdom in an effective manner to employees so they female genitalia complete the desired task. He also believes that strong problem solving skills come along with people skills you should be able to mediate an resolution surrounded by employees or a client in a way as to non effect production or lose a client. Jack believes that situation plays a role in leadership. This is what separates strong leaders from the average. A strong leader lav be placed in most any situation and be successful. If a mediocre lead er is put into a simple or familiar situation they could be interpreted as a strong leader only will fail when tested.He also states that there are a some situations where even the strongest most experienced leaders will fail. The example of a pilot, seconds from destruction, could direct and organize his crew to the best of anyones ability and that still fatally crash. This relates to business during market downturns and changes in technology. If you have too much expense and debt during a downturn or your only product has adept been rendered obsolete by a new technology, there is not much you hatful do. When asked around the followers he prefers to refer to them as the team and they need to work unitedly if they are going to be lead well. Although when asked if a strong leader can take mischievousness followers and still carry out a common goal, he believes it can be done. Jack still refers back to the military, when grunts come in frequent infantry they are widely dist ri hardlyedly bad followers but a strong leader can bring them together, have them work as a group and agree to go to war together.In Jacks career he has encountered good and bad followers, some needing a lot of structure and others which could be trusted to complete the work with tokenish super slew. Jack has a very laid back style of leadership and with some employees this became an issue because they took vantage of the freedom. In Jacks experience leaders can be learn but there is a low group that will never be a good leader. In society he believes there is a very monstrous kernel ground of people who can be trained to accomplish anything they laid their mind to. He thinks that some great leaders are innate(p) that way and it comes much more effort slightly than for others. That being said, if one of the heart ground individuals had the desire and training they too can rise to be a great leader and accomplish great things. In general Jack believes that great leaders can e ither be born(p) or trained to achieve the spiritedest level of leadership and that there is a small group of individuals that un-salvageable.After this interview I think Jack has a understanding of what makes a leader but still has tilt to do. branch and foremost leadership is a process and not just a single tactic to achieve a single goal. It is the victimization of relationships between the leader and the followers along with the relationships between the followers themselves. through and through these emotional connections a leader can work with a group of followers and accomplish great things even when situation may be very difficult. I found it very interesting when talking about the characteristics of a strong leader Jacks first retort is wisdom, which I believe he relates to intelligence. Intelligence is a very large factor in being a strong leader but being inspiring is just as important. Being a people person does not make you a good leader. An individual can be very kind and a good listener but unless they can inspire a group of people to work together for a common goal they will not be effective.Jack believes that leaders can be trained to accomplish a high level of success much like the ones that are natural leaders. This is composition is in line with academics that leadership can be classically trained and not only gained by experience. Another issue with Jacks interlingual rendition of leadership is how a strong leader can improve an already good situation. He calculates that strong leaders can handle most situations and accomplish necessary tasks but fails to acknowledge that the entire dynamic is related. His views count negative towards a leader with a good group of followers and a positive situation, that with a strong or marginal leader you will have the same result. I disagree with this idea and believe with a strong leader you can have increased productiveness and quality of product. It also seems that Jack thinks all managers a re leaders which is not the case. Managers and leaders have many of the same characteristics but hold various roles indoors a company.Managers are there to provide guidance and accomplish a short term goal or task whereas a leader is there to inspire and create a challenging vision for the long term success of a company. True leaders will be introspective as they learn from experience. This is known as the action-observation-reflection molding in which a leader will take an experience and give it additional attention to learn as much as possible. First you must review the action that caused the experience, then review the outcome of that action and finally determine how you feel about the outcome. When using this method reviewing a situation one can gain a great make do of knowledge to apply in the future. Jack also seems to have primal attribution error when reflecting on why he considers an employee to be bad. He has a bias that when an employee is not functioning at their fu ll power it is only due to them taking advantage of him and his method of management.He fails to see if there could be any outside factors causing these behaviors for example, if an employee is also a student who in enrolled in a very difficult material body may appear to be leaving early and taking advantage when in fact they just have a class to attend. This could be easily remedied by offering a flexible schedule where the employee could pay back their work day a little earlier. This also relates to the self constituent bias where this employee could hold Jack responsible for not performing in class instead of realizing they didnt dedicate enough time out of class for study. Jack also believes that to be a good leader you must be very proficient in the task at hand. The academics disagree with this idea and note that the higher level of management the less technical knowledge you must have.This is where vision and inspiration become super important to guide your followers to success. In conclusion Jack has well-educated well from his years of experience but there is still direction for growth in his knowledge of leadership and management, especially the difference between the two. Something that would greatly foster improve the quality of management and leadership within the company would be using some assessment the leaders. This could be accomplish by having a questionnaire rating the leader by the superiors and subordinates. This method would help understand the performance of the leader as assessed by the superior and the strength as provided by the subordinates questionnaire.