Name of case and docket Buksa, Ray vs. cheerfulness Toyota Padamsey, pass Etal Date of trial February 13, 2003 Courtroom number #264 Name of resign D.G. Ingram Names and occupations of all witnesses No witnesses at trial What did the complainant sue for? $3000.00 Assessment for damages What was the defendants defense? The locomotive installed in Mr. Buksas Toyota was properly installed and at not fault of fair weather Toyota did the railway locomotive neglectdown. Did the defendant make a claim against the plaintiff? If so, what for? No counterclaim was made by the defendant. Summarize the facts and the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendant and other witnesses The plaintiff Mr Buksa had an locomotive engine installed at Sun Toyota, the engine was a rebuilt engine. The rebuilt engine broke down after 3 months and was only on a lower floor imprimatur by Sun Toyota for 30 days. Mr. Buksa learned that the engine was not installed properly and hence that was the caus e of the engine break down. Sun Toyota would not comply with Mr. Buksas plea of installing or secureness the engine without charge. This continued for over 10 months. Did the parties flummox lawyers? If so what did they do? The defendant Sun Toyota had a lawyer correct them in this matter.
The lawyer took the case on the gradient of Sun Toyota and basically was Suns voice at the trial. Describe the role of the reckon. Did s/he get involved or remain withdraw? Give examples. The judge heard the evidence from both parties. The judge took control and made sure both parties understood the execution fully. The judge a lso found a solution to the post he was pr! esented with. In the case, the defendants lawyer was ill informed and whence another court date was finally agreed to. What was the role... If you distress to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment